<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compatibility Of Draft Agreement On Unified Patent Court with EU acquis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/10/03/compatibility-of-draft-agreement-on-unified-patent-court-with-eu-acquis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/10/03/compatibility-of-draft-agreement-on-unified-patent-court-with-eu-acquis/</link>
	<description>Intellectual Property Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yet Another Amended Draft Agreement On EU Unified Patent Court &#124; ksnh::law</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/10/03/compatibility-of-draft-agreement-on-unified-patent-court-with-eu-acquis/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Yet Another Amended Draft Agreement On EU Unified Patent Court &#124; ksnh::law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=725#comment-105</guid>
		<description>[...] appear to be more or less of a technical nature. In particular, some conclusions from the non-paper Document 14191/11 titled Compatibility of the draft agreement on the Unified Patent Court with the Union acquis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] appear to be more or less of a technical nature. In particular, some conclusions from the non-paper Document 14191/11 titled Compatibility of the draft agreement on the Unified Patent Court with the Union acquis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EU Patent Failing to Materialise, But EPO and Politicians Begin to Overstep Their Line of Authority to Intervene &#124; Techrights</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/10/03/compatibility-of-draft-agreement-on-unified-patent-court-with-eu-acquis/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>EU Patent Failing to Materialise, But EPO and Politicians Begin to Overstep Their Line of Authority to Intervene &#124; Techrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=725#comment-103</guid>
		<description>[...] the EU Patent (which he actually seems to be advocating for, due to his profit motive). He now reports on lack of compatibility:  Hence, some work on the text of Brussels I appears to be necessary in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the EU Patent (which he actually seems to be advocating for, due to his profit motive). He now reports on lack of compatibility:  Hence, some work on the text of Brussels I appears to be necessary in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gibus</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/10/03/compatibility-of-draft-agreement-on-unified-patent-court-with-eu-acquis/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Gibus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=725#comment-91</guid>
		<description>There is still another issue to clarify: with regard to the case law of the CJEU (notably AETR case), can Member States access to such an agreement &lt;em&gt;on their own without the EU beeing party of the agreement&lt;/em&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is still another issue to clarify: with regard to the case law of the CJEU (notably AETR case), can Member States access to such an agreement <em>on their own without the EU beeing party of the agreement</em>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
