<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memo for Competitive Council Meeting on 5, 6 Dec 2011 names &#8220;Seat of the future Unified Patent Court&#8221; as Controversial Issue (UPDATE)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/02/memo-for-competitive-council-meeting-on-5-6-dec-2011-names-seat-of-the-future-unified-patent-court-as-controversial-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/02/memo-for-competitive-council-meeting-on-5-6-dec-2011-names-seat-of-the-future-unified-patent-court-as-controversial-issue/</link>
	<description>Intellectual Property Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gibus</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/02/memo-for-competitive-council-meeting-on-5-6-dec-2011-names-seat-of-the-future-unified-patent-court-as-controversial-issue/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Gibus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=1356#comment-207</guid>
		<description>And another coverage: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unitary-patent.eu/content/unitary-patent-undone-%E2%80%9Cdone-deal%E2%80%9D&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Unitary patent: an undone “done deal”&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And another coverage: <a href="https://www.unitary-patent.eu/content/unitary-patent-undone-%E2%80%9Cdone-deal%E2%80%9D" rel="nofollow">Unitary patent: an undone “done deal”</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
