<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the EU Patent Package Still &#8220;Broadly Accepted in Substance&#8221; or Already About to Fail Due to National Egoisms? (UPDATE)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/08/is-the-eu-patent-package-still-broadly-accepted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/08/is-the-eu-patent-package-still-broadly-accepted/</link>
	<description>Intellectual Property Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EU Patent Package: JURI has Spoken, But What did it Say? &#124; ksnh::law</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/08/is-the-eu-patent-package-still-broadly-accepted/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>EU Patent Package: JURI has Spoken, But What did it Say? &#124; ksnh::law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=1396#comment-295</guid>
		<description>[...] yesterday, after the Competitiveness Council meeting of December 5 failed (see our earlier posts [1], [2], [3]), which implies that there is no such thing as a text accepted by both EU Council and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yesterday, after the Competitiveness Council meeting of December 5 failed (see our earlier posts [1], [2], [3]), which implies that there is no such thing as a text accepted by both EU Council and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Rebentisch</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/08/is-the-eu-patent-package-still-broadly-accepted/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Rebentisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=1396#comment-279</guid>
		<description>&quot;That is, the provisions dealing with substantive patent law on patent infringement will remain part of the Unitary Patent, thus making substantive patent law part of EU legal order.&quot;

What else? I wonder why the EU Commission hasn&#039;t transposed the Strassbourg convention into community law, yet? It basically reflects the objections of the patent community against democratic rule, so called kritarchic rule is not common to our modern tradition. We do not need to bow in to the British judges here and their objections to a democratic legislature. After all it is a bit odd to get a Swedish politician as Wikström to argue against rule of written law on the EU level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That is, the provisions dealing with substantive patent law on patent infringement will remain part of the Unitary Patent, thus making substantive patent law part of EU legal order.&#8221;</p>
<p>What else? I wonder why the EU Commission hasn&#8217;t transposed the Strassbourg convention into community law, yet? It basically reflects the objections of the patent community against democratic rule, so called kritarchic rule is not common to our modern tradition. We do not need to bow in to the British judges here and their objections to a democratic legislature. After all it is a bit odd to get a Swedish politician as Wikström to argue against rule of written law on the EU level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polish Presidency May Not Celebrate Initialling of &#8216;Warsaw Patent Convention&#8217; on 22 December 2011 &#124; ksnh::law</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/08/is-the-eu-patent-package-still-broadly-accepted/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Polish Presidency May Not Celebrate Initialling of &#8216;Warsaw Patent Convention&#8217; on 22 December 2011 &#124; ksnh::law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 12:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=1396#comment-274</guid>
		<description>[...] critical voices show up [1, 2] and issues that thought to be fixed appear to be uncertain again [3, 4] while unsolved issues become more complex [5] the Presidency appears to lose its positive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] critical voices show up [1, 2] and issues that thought to be fixed appear to be uncertain again [3, 4] while unsolved issues become more complex [5] the Presidency appears to lose its positive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: European Patent Lawyers Consider Proposed Unified Patent Court an &#8220;Unwanted Present for Industry&#8221; &#124; ksnh::law</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/08/is-the-eu-patent-package-still-broadly-accepted/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>European Patent Lawyers Consider Proposed Unified Patent Court an &#8220;Unwanted Present for Industry&#8221; &#124; ksnh::law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=1396#comment-262</guid>
		<description>[...] reported earlier, there is a strong desire of (parts of) industry [1, 2] and patent professionals [1, 2, 3], [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reported earlier, there is a strong desire of (parts of) industry [1, 2] and patent professionals [1, 2, 3], [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is the EU Patent Package Still “Broadly Accepted in Substance” or &#8230; &#124; Attorney</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/08/is-the-eu-patent-package-still-broadly-accepted/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Is the EU Patent Package Still “Broadly Accepted in Substance” or &#8230; &#124; Attorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=1396#comment-222</guid>
		<description>[...] european patent attorney &#8211; Google Blog Search     &#171; Nash Matthews takes gold for Cambridge Philharmonic Society &#8211; Cambridge Network [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] european patent attorney &#8211; Google Blog Search     &laquo; Nash Matthews takes gold for Cambridge Philharmonic Society &#8211; Cambridge Network [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
