<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critical Position Paper of International IP Federation FICPI on Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/14/critical-position-paper-of-international-ip-federation-ficpi-on-unitary-patent-and-unified-patent-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/14/critical-position-paper-of-international-ip-federation-ficpi-on-unitary-patent-and-unified-patent-court/</link>
	<description>Intellectual Property Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polish Presidency May Not Celebrate &#8216;Warsaw Patent Convention&#8217; as EU Patent Deal is at a Tipping Point (UPDATE) &#124; ksnh::law</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/14/critical-position-paper-of-international-ip-federation-ficpi-on-unitary-patent-and-unified-patent-court/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Polish Presidency May Not Celebrate &#8216;Warsaw Patent Convention&#8217; as EU Patent Deal is at a Tipping Point (UPDATE) &#124; ksnh::law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=1475#comment-273</guid>
		<description>[...] to go slowly and to take a few more months instead of finalising a failed system in a haste [1, 2]. Further, issues that thought to be fixed appear to be uncertain again [3, 4] while unsolved [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to go slowly and to take a few more months instead of finalising a failed system in a haste [1, 2]. Further, issues that thought to be fixed appear to be uncertain again [3, 4] while unsolved [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critical Position Paper of International IP Federation FICPI on &#8230; &#124; Attorney</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/14/critical-position-paper-of-international-ip-federation-ficpi-on-unitary-patent-and-unified-patent-court/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Critical Position Paper of International IP Federation FICPI on &#8230; &#124; Attorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=1475#comment-266</guid>
		<description>[...] ip attorney &#8211; Google Blog Search     &#171; Where is the state attorney in Marlins stadium fiasco? &#8211; Miami Today Kelly Frels [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ip attorney &#8211; Google Blog Search     &laquo; Where is the state attorney in Marlins stadium fiasco? &#8211; Miami Today Kelly Frels [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critical Position Paper of International IP Federation FICPI on &#8230; &#124; Attorney</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/14/critical-position-paper-of-international-ip-federation-ficpi-on-unitary-patent-and-unified-patent-court/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Critical Position Paper of International IP Federation FICPI on &#8230; &#124; Attorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=1475#comment-265</guid>
		<description>[...] international attorney &#8211; Google Blog Search     &#171; Council approves mall deal &#8211; Toledo Blade Funny Divorce Lawyer Commercial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] international attorney &#8211; Google Blog Search     &laquo; Council approves mall deal &#8211; Toledo Blade Funny Divorce Lawyer Commercial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RC</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2011/12/14/critical-position-paper-of-international-ip-federation-ficpi-on-unitary-patent-and-unified-patent-court/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>RC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=1475#comment-259</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many&quot; countries? As far as I know, only Germany and the UK, and I doubt that even in those countries &quot;lawyers&quot; will be interpreted as covering patent attorneys.

I&#039;m afraid that our lawyer friends keep scheming to keep this whole cake for themselves. FICPI can hardly pretend to be representing the interests of its patent attorney membership with this analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many&#8221; countries? As far as I know, only Germany and the UK, and I doubt that even in those countries &#8220;lawyers&#8221; will be interpreted as covering patent attorneys.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid that our lawyer friends keep scheming to keep this whole cake for themselves. FICPI can hardly pretend to be representing the interests of its patent attorney membership with this analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
