<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unitary Patent: Political Struggle and Shift of Competence towards Central Division</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2012/07/03/unitary-patent-political-struggle-and-shift-of-competence-towards-central-division/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2012/07/03/unitary-patent-political-struggle-and-shift-of-competence-towards-central-division/</link>
	<description>Intellectual Property Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JURI Committee considers Council version of Unitary Patent Regulation infringing EU Primary Law and leaves for Summer Break &#124; ksnh::law</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2012/07/03/unitary-patent-political-struggle-and-shift-of-competence-towards-central-division/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>JURI Committee considers Council version of Unitary Patent Regulation infringing EU Primary Law and leaves for Summer Break &#124; ksnh::law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=3195#comment-784</guid>
		<description>[...] among members of the EU Parliament in general and its legal committee (JURI) in particular (see here and here), the direction in which toaday&#8217;s JURI meeting would go was not utterly hard to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] among members of the EU Parliament in general and its legal committee (JURI) in particular (see here and here), the direction in which toaday&#8217;s JURI meeting would go was not utterly hard to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rc</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2012/07/03/unitary-patent-political-struggle-and-shift-of-competence-towards-central-division/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Rc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=3195#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Quite frankly, granting non-EU patentees (and only them!) the right to pursue infringement proceedings at the Central Division rather than the Local Division of the defendant and/or infringement seems utterly bonkers, especially considering the rules regarding the language of the proceedings. What will happen when, say, a Portuguese SME, operating exclusively in the domestic market, finds itself sued, in English, at the Munich chamber of the Central Division by a US multinational or, worse, a patent troll based in some Caribbean tax haven?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite frankly, granting non-EU patentees (and only them!) the right to pursue infringement proceedings at the Central Division rather than the Local Division of the defendant and/or infringement seems utterly bonkers, especially considering the rules regarding the language of the proceedings. What will happen when, say, a Portuguese SME, operating exclusively in the domestic market, finds itself sued, in English, at the Munich chamber of the Central Division by a US multinational or, worse, a patent troll based in some Caribbean tax haven?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
