<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 15th UPC Draft Rules of Procedure open for Public Consultation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2013/06/26/15th-upc-draft-rules-of-procedure-open-for-public-consultation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2013/06/26/15th-upc-draft-rules-of-procedure-open-for-public-consultation/</link>
	<description>Intellectual Property Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2013/06/26/15th-upc-draft-rules-of-procedure-open-for-public-consultation/#comment-12823</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 13:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=4589#comment-12823</guid>
		<description>&quot;Interestingly, European patent attorneys having a law degree would not be fully authorised, as the epi membership does not authorise any practise before a national court.&quot;

1) For this reason the officially used Englisch terminology &quot;European patent attorney&quot; is inappropriate. The correct term should be &quot;registered representative for EPO proceedings&quot; or something similar.

2) I can not understand why the Swedish Patent Attorneys Board is explicitly mentioned in Rule 286 (1). It is new to me that Sweden is the center of gravitiy for patents in Europe. So, can someone tell me the reason for that?

Best regards, Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Interestingly, European patent attorneys having a law degree would not be fully authorised, as the epi membership does not authorise any practise before a national court.&#8221;</p>
<p>1) For this reason the officially used Englisch terminology &#8220;European patent attorney&#8221; is inappropriate. The correct term should be &#8220;registered representative for EPO proceedings&#8221; or something similar.</p>
<p>2) I can not understand why the Swedish Patent Attorneys Board is explicitly mentioned in Rule 286 (1). It is new to me that Sweden is the center of gravitiy for patents in Europe. So, can someone tell me the reason for that?</p>
<p>Best regards, Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: law group practice</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2013/06/26/15th-upc-draft-rules-of-procedure-open-for-public-consultation/#comment-12743</link>
		<dc:creator>law group practice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 10:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=4589#comment-12743</guid>
		<description>It is detaily explained for people this site Lawyers within the meaning of Article 48(1) of the Agreement are also persons possessing a law degree who are authorised by the Swedish Patent Attorneys Board or equivalent body in a Contracting Member State</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is detaily explained for people this site Lawyers within the meaning of Article 48(1) of the Agreement are also persons possessing a law degree who are authorised by the Swedish Patent Attorneys Board or equivalent body in a Contracting Member State</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mckinney personal injury lawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/2013/06/26/15th-upc-draft-rules-of-procedure-open-for-public-consultation/#comment-12736</link>
		<dc:creator>mckinney personal injury lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 08:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ksnh.eu/en/?p=4589#comment-12736</guid>
		<description>such as the Swedish Patent Attorney’s Board ,by now, nothing is known as to which other qualifications would be sufficient besides the EPLC.
     &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.caraccidentattorneymckinney.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mckinney car wreck attorney&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>such as the Swedish Patent Attorney’s Board ,by now, nothing is known as to which other qualifications would be sufficient besides the EPLC.<br />
     <a href="http://www.caraccidentattorneymckinney.com/" rel="nofollow">mckinney car wreck attorney</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
