As something like a pre-Christmas present, the European Patent Office startet off into the bright future of online communication and interaction last week.
On 13 December 2011 a President’s Decision and a related Notice introduced the notification of communication in selected EPO proceedings via online mailboxes (entered into force on 15 December 2011), while a Notice dated 15 December 2011 informed on the newly launched web-based consultation platform for proposed changes to European patent law and practice.
Electronic Notification. On 15 December 2011 the EPO started phasing in electronic notification by initially notifying:
- the Extended European Search Report (EESR) pursuant Rule 62 EPC, i.e. the European or partial European search report (Art 92, R 61, 63 EPC) plus the European search opinion – or the declaration of no search (R 63 EPC), and
- the International Search Report (Art 18 PCT), together with the Written Opinion under Rule 43bis PCT.
The initial test phase is planned for the 1st quarter of 2012. In the later course, the EPO will gradually expand electronic notification to include all other pre-grant communications with an initial user group consisting of willing professional representatives holding an EPO smart card and having activated the EPO Mailbox (see Notice). Paper copies will not be provided any more – thus, the Mailbox will in future be the single point of delivery.
Notification is made by an electronic communication to the representative’s EPO mailbox, the e-communication containing a link to the notified document in an EPO database. Notification is deemed to have been effected at the latest on the tenth day after transmission of the electronic communication to the Mailbox.
More information can be found in a brochure covering the whole spectrum of online sevices, such as searching, drafting, online filing, paying fees, accessing publications, and managing files by MyFiles (see FAQ) and the new Mailbox (see FAQ, Quick Reference Guide).
Consulting Platform. The purpose of the new web-based consultation platform for proposed changes to European patent law and practice is to facilitate the early involvement of patent system users in the law-making process of the European Patent Organisation. The EPO will publish on its website preliminary drafts of proposed amendments to the Implementing Regulations, the Rules relating to Fees or to examination practice and by this invite the public to submit comments on these drafts, which are promised to be analysed carefully by the EPO.
This project truly has the potential to increase transparency and enhance the usefulness of changes for users of the patent system, as hoped by the EPO. As hoped by professional representatives, the amended rules on filing of divisional applications will be dicussed very soon – maybe by way of a suggestion system allowing applicants and presentatives to suggest amendments for discussion. But the sleds of Father Christmas appear to be already empty.
Comments. There should be no doubt that one day the EPO Mailbox will sooner or later be facilitated with upload functionality as well. Usinf the Mailbox will then be made compulsory so that the complete communication between the EPO and its users will exclusively run through this singe-point-of-communication interface. The EPO would then fully benefit from streamlined and automatic communication processes. This was at least the case for the MyPage service of OHIM, a personalised platform providing a range of online solutions for CTM/RCD applicants, such as an e-communication mailbox facility (see here).
However, besides the excitement about modern opportunities to increase efficiency, such consequent ‘electronification’ of services may turn out to be less beneficial for applicants (and their representatives), since the implemented solutions tend to improve internal efficiency by shifting responsibilities, infrastructural issues and work to the applicants and/or representatives.
Clearly, like OHIM before, EPO now starts to shift burden from the office to the applicants/representatives, who will be responsible for setting up and maintaining the required hardware and software infrastructure in order to be able to regularly and reliably access office-sided mailboxes and retrieve official e-mail notifications.
At least from a more principle point of view, such well-meant e-communication approaches may easy tend to – maybe unintentionally – increase anonymity and to hide the office behind an Internet portal. The epi and other observers of the EPO’s “Technical and Operational Support Committee” should keep an eye on these initiatives to make sure that they are of benefit for both EPO and applicants/representatives, just like it was the OAMI user’s group‘s duty in case of MyPage.
Volker 'Falk' Metzler
European Patent Attorney, German 'Patentanwalt', European Trademark and Design Attorney, Computer Scientist, PhD, IP Blogger, Father of Two, Mountain Enthusiast
The k/s/n/h::law blog
Some of the patent attorneys of the KSNH law firm have joined their efforts to research what is going on in the various branches of IP law and practice in order to keep themselves, their clients as well as interested circles of the public up to date. This blog is intended to present results of such efforts to a wider public.
- June 2013 (2)
- March 2013 (5)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (5)
- November 2012 (5)
- July 2012 (5)
- June 2012 (8)
- May 2012 (5)
- April 2012 (3)
- March 2012 (4)
- February 2012 (5)
- January 2012 (6)
- December 2011 (12)
- November 2011 (9)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (7)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (1)
- business methods (4)
- EPC (4)
- EPO (8)
- EU law (86)
- European Patent Law (34)
- German Patent ACt (PatG) (1)
- German patent law (5)
- Germany (4)
- Pirate Party (3)
- International Patent Law (3)
- PCT (1)
- IP politics (10)
- licenses (2)
- Litigation (5)
- Patentability (6)
- Patents (12)
- Piratenpartei (2)
- Software inventions (8)
- Uncategorized (9)
- Unitary Patent (21)
- US Patent Law (2)
- RC on Unitary Patent Court: Are lawyers different from lawyers?
- Unitary Patent Court: Are lawyers different fro... on Unitary Patent Court: Are lawyers different from lawyers?
- Aspects of the UPC (2): Sunrise Period and Opt-... on Aspects of the UPC (2): Sunrise Period and Opt-out Fee
- Gibus on Unitary Patent Court: Are lawyers different from lawyers?
- Aspects of the UPC (1): Transitional Scheme and Opt-Out | ksnh::law | European Unitary Patent News | Scoop.it on Aspects of the UPC (1): Transitional Scheme and Opt-Out
- No public Twitter messages.
- Moderne Zeiten oder: DPMA und Patentgericht streiten über die elektronische Akte April 25, 2013Bekanntlich hat das Deutsche Patent- und Markenamt (DPMA) im Jahre 2013 mit der rein technischen Fertigstellung der Einrichtungen zur elektronischen Akteneinsicht einen wichtigen Meilenstein seines Überganges von der Papierakte zur “elektronischen Akte” erreicht. Im DPMA werden aber bereits seit dem 01. Juni 2011 Patente, Gebrauchsmuster, Topografien und erg […]
- Gutachten zu Forschung, Innovation und technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands 2013 March 11, 2013Unter dem Datum vom 28. Februar 2013 ist die Bundestags-Drucksache 17/12611 veröffentlicht worden Sie trägt den Titel Unterrichtung durch die Bundesregierung - Gutachten zu Forschung, Innovation und technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands 2013. Die Bundesregierung legt dem Deutschen Bundestag seit dem Jahr 2008 […]
- 3D-Printing: Zum Filesharing von 3D-Modelldaten February 25, 2013In meiner kleinen zuvor angekündigten Reihe über rechtliche Aspekte des 3D Printing komme ich heute auf die Frage zu sprechen, ob die Hersteller von Gerätschaften es hinnehmen müssen, wenn Ersatztreile davon – vom Brillengestell über Smartphone-Gehäuseteile bis hin zu Rastenmähermotor-Abdeckungen – gescannt und die daraus […]
- Die Änderungen im US Patentrecht durch den ‘America Invents Act’, Teil 3 February 7, 2013In unserer dreiteiligen Artikelserie zum ‘America Invents Act’ (AIA) haben wir bisher in Teil 1 die Änderungen zum 16. September 2011 und in Teil 2 die Änderungen zum 16. September 2012 beleuchtet. Das letzte Paket der Ändeungen im US Patentrecht tritt zum 16. März 2013 in Kraft und ist Gegenstand des vorliegenden dritten Teils […]
- 3D Printing: Das nächste große Ding? January 31, 2013In einem kürzlich von Yvonne Ortmann geführten und auf t3n.de veröffentlichen Interview äußert Sascha Pallenberg: Welche Web- und Startup Trends zeichnen sich aus deiner Sicht gerade ab? Hardware, Maker, […]
- Moderne Zeiten oder: DPMA und Patentgericht streiten über die elektronische Akte April 25, 2013